| 
THE Braga borefest was Liverpool's 13th game in Europe this season. Unlucky for us. The Reds' Europa League performances have been shockingly dull, but why?
As tempting as it is, we can't just blame Roy Hodgson. Performances have been no better in the continent’s second-rate competition under Kenny Dalglish than they were under the deluded, blame-shifting, one-dimensional, stuck-in-the-past, black hole of negativity that was the former Neuchatel Xamax boss.
Dalglish's team selection for the Braga match drew criticism from many fans who were dismayed to see a starting eleven featuring Jay Spearing, Lucas and Christian Poulsen, a selection hardly conducive to flowing, attacking football. Lucas is certainly capable of producing a spark when utilised in the right areas, but against Braga attacking duties were handed to Raul Meireles and Dirk Kuyt. The pair barely linked in a dismal first half that gave the home fans little to worry about.
That said, Dalglish can hardly be blamed for the quality of the passing and the lack of movement that was evident all night until Andy Carroll entered the fray. With the footballing trio of Fabio Aurelio, Daniel Agger and Martin Kelly stripped from the backline due to injury, there was never likely to be much much creativity from the defence either, the usually attack-minded Glen Johnson aside.
And with Steven Gerrard crocked, and facing a fight to feature again this season, Carroll not fit enough to start and Luis Suarez ineligible, Dalglish's options were severely limited.
As has been demonstrated so often this season, Liverpool are only a couple of players short of being a top side. In fact the strongest eleven can compete with the best – see the double over Chelsea and last week's win over Manchester United, who to be fair were distinctly average. But equally, the Reds are also only a couple of players away from being an average side.
Take away some of the key components, like on Thursday, and the side looks disjointed, lacks direction and is bereft of ideas. Thursday's game just underlined what we already knew – the squad isn't strong enough and desperately needs strengthening if we are to challenge for the top four next season.
So while it's easy to point the finger at Dalglish for his selection, what were the realistic alternatives to those that heard the first whistle in the Estádio Municipal de Braga? David Ngog? Dani Pacheco? Maxi Rodriguez?
Ngog has failed to impress this season and his opportunities under Dalglish have been limited, suggesting his Anfield future is in doubt. Pacheco has proved he can cut it for the reserves but three managers in succession have been wary about handing him a first-team chance. There must be reasons behind that, be it attitude, strength or size.
As for Rodriguez, while he might have a decent terrace ditty to his name, he's somewhat of an enigma. He's certainly a capable footballer, but he has a tendency to disappear in games, lacks pace and at 30, doesn't represent a long-term option. He's certainly no winger.
As good a job as Dalglish has done since his long overdue return, he can't make silk purses out of sow's ears. Deadwood remains in the Liverpool squad but the Europa League's punishing schedule makes it impossible for the strongest line-up to be fielded game to game.
There's also the added factor that some players need to be displayed in the shop window. To find buyers for players like Joe Cole and Christian Poulsen, two more who appear to be on borrowed time, they need to play. If they're completely frozen out, the message is loud and clear – they're not trusted to do a job. Or worse, they're past it.
Squad strength aside, is there also a motivational issue in the Europa League? It's all too easy to put players on a pedestal and assume their astronomical wages coupled with the privilege of playing for Liverpool should result in a committed performance no matter who the opposition or what the competition.
But back in the real world, do the players perhaps think the Europa League is as much of a pain in the arse as many fans do? Isn't it entirely feasible that they will have watched Arsenal playing in the Nou Camp and Spurs taking on AC Milan with a tinge of sadness? After all it wasn't long ago that Liverpool were beating AC Milan and winning in Barcelona themselves.
As it is, the Reds have scored just once in their past five Europa League matches away from Anfield, labouring their way through the competition with better performances on home soil. If they go all the way in the competition, Liverpool will have clocked up 18 games – almost half the fixtures in a Premier League season and five more than when the UEFA Cup was won in Dortmund in 2001.
Winning it again represents Liverpool's only chance of ending a five-year trophy drought this season. It also looks like the most realistic route back into Europe next season with the only other entry likely to be via fifth place in the Premier League (explaining why is a blog post in itself). But do Liverpool need another Europa League campaign?
OK, missing out on Europe for the first time since 1999/2000 would reduce revenues and effect Liverpool's rating in the UEFA coefficient, meaning less favourable draws in the early rounds of the Europa and Champions League the next time they compete.
But can we really strengthen sufficiently in one summer to be able to challenge on all fronts? It would take hard work, a lot of money and a bit of luck for deals in and out to fall just how Liverpool want. And without the Champions League (is the Europa League really a lure for players?) is one window enough to get us to a situation where we can rival Man United, Arsenal, Chelsea, Man City and Spurs for squad strength?
It's a big ask. Probably too big an ask. So while it goes against the grain for a club that has the mantra that it “exists to win trophies” it could benefit the club not to be involved in next season's Europa League competiton.
With up to 18 games less, it would give the manager, which will surely be Dalglish, a greater chance of fielding his strongest XI in the Premier League week in and week out, and therefore boost the chance of reclaiming a top-four position – a must if we're to get back to where we want to be long term, challenging for number 19.
The Europa League can be enjoyed and it was under its previous straight knockout format (Barcelona at Anfield and Alaves in Dortmund are two of my highlights following Liverpool). But football has changed, just like the competition. Like the FA Cup, it's been devalued, and now it feels like a grind, and not just for Liverpool.
There’s too many games and for those that haven’t got the time, cash or inclination to follow their team to some far flung corners of the continent, even the TV coverage is second rate. Stan Collymore? Jim Rosenthal? You can barely hear them speak over the sound of the barrel being scraped.
The UEFA Cup did matter, but a bit like Liverpool minus key players like Suarez, Kelly, Agger and Gerrard, it’s lost its mojo. There's been too much tinkering and rule-making. It's also suffered, like the FA Cup, from standing shoulder to shoulder with a competition that in terms of revenue, exposure and prestige is the be all and end all. Parachuting in the third-placed teams from the group stages of the Champions League doesn't help, either. It all feels a bit false and a bit forced.
Liverpool exists to win trophies but football's changed so maybe the mantra should too. Perhaps now Liverpool should exist to win the right trophies?
Issue three of the mag is now available free online here
Click HERE to buy issue six of Well Red
|